Whitney Caraway, RN, MSN, ACM-RN, CPHQ, LNC

Founder and Lead Consultant

With over 18 years of healthcare experience, Whitney specializes in Quality, Regulation, and Care Planning. She has been a Registered Nurse for 12 years, with experience in the Emergency Department, Medical-Surgical, Obstetrics, and Surgery. 

Whitney works closely with interdisciplinary teams within the state of Arizona by Co-Chairing Task Forces focusing on Chronic Conditions, Social Determinants of Health, Mental Health, and Community Health Needs. She has served as Chair of Policy and Procedure Committees, and performs regular risk assessments on sentinel events and high-risk occurrences. 

Whitney is currently an active member of the National Association for Healthcare Quality, holding the organization's honored distinction of Certified Professional of Healthcare Quality.  She is also an active member of the American Case Management Association, serving as an Accredited Case Manager. 

Not every case holds up once the medical records are fully evaluated.

Early review helps identify how well the medical evidence supports the theory of the case and where it may break down.

This includes:

• how the timeline aligns with the alleged injury
• potential deviations in care
• where causation is supported or weakened
• gaps, inconsistencies, and missing records



The goal is to provide a clear, medically grounded view of the strengths and vulnerabilities within the case so informed decisions can be made early.

When the details of a case need to be clearly understood and strategically outlined, a fact summary is often the starting point.

This is not a generic summary. Each case is broken down in a narrative format that:

• aligns medical events with each claim
• addresses causation and contributing factors
• highlights gaps, inconsistencies, and key turning points
• supports early case evaluation and direction

This is commonly used in smaller or early-stage cases, but the same level of analysis applies regardless of case size.

A timeline alone does not strengthen a case.

Most chronologies simply organize records. They do not make the case clearer.

Our chronologies are built to:

• show progression over time
• identify where care deviates or breaks down
• isolate what matters and remove what does not
• support causation and damages in a usable format

No filler. No unnecessary detail. Only what impacts the case.

These can also be adapted for expert review by removing embedded analysis and providing a clean, structured timeline.

The right expert is not just qualified. They are aligned with the case.

We identify and vet experts based on:

• clinical relevance to the specific issues
• ability to support the theory of the case
• credibility and prior testimony when applicable

This ensures the expert strengthens the case instead of creating risk.

As cases move toward litigation, the medical details become more critical and more time-consuming.

We work alongside attorneys and their teams to:

• prepare for depositions
• identify which providers should be deposed
• develop targeted medical questioning
• organize records and timelines for efficient use
• support overall case strategy from a medical standpoint

This allows the legal team to stay focused while the medical side is fully managed.

Medical information is only useful if it can be clearly presented.

We develop trial exhibits that:

• simplify complex medical details
• visually support timeline and progression
• reinforce key points related to causation and damages

Clear. Focused. Built to support the case.